Implementation-first service

Recover from migration and relaunch mistakes

Traffic drops after migrations usually come from redirect gaps, canonical carryover, broken internal links, stale sitemaps, noindex mistakes, template regressions, or tracking loss.

$1,250–$2,000 launch or migration QA

Typical issues

What this lane is built to isolate

  • High-value legacy URLs lack a mapped destination
  • Canonicals or noindex survive from staging
  • Internal links and sitemaps retain old routes
  • Templates, tracking, or response behavior regress

What you get

Implemented or implementation-ready

A recovery sprint focused on the failures suppressing visibility or breaking site behavior, with verification and a written handoff.

Best fit

A problem narrow enough to verify

A clear release or migration event followed by lost visibility, broken crawl paths, or post-launch regressions.

Paid delivery evidence

Legacy URL recovery with explicit redirect boundaries

The linked WordPress case covers mapped legacy routes, safe exclusions from blanket rules, and live single-hop redirect QA.

It does not claim that every retired URL recovered rankings, traffic, or indexation.

Start with the accountable phase

Have the site, symptom, and business outcome?

Send what broke, what outcome it blocks, the current baseline, and who can implement the change. Evidence can be attached when it helps qualification.