Implementation-first service
Traffic drops after migrations usually come from a short list of technical failures: redirect gaps, canonical carryover, broken internal links, stale sitemaps, noindex mistakes, template regressions, or tracking loss.
Sprint shape
Clear scope before implementation, one controlled sprint, and written verification at the end.
The first pass is meant to move the actual problem, not generate vague theory or generic audits without implementation.
Most relaunch drops come from a short list of repeat failures: redirect gaps, canonical carryover from old templates, staging directives left live, broken internal links, host or version mismatches, stale sitemaps, and tracking gaps that make the rollout look worse or better than it really is.
The job of the first sprint is to identify the few launch failures that are actually suppressing visibility or breaking user paths, not to turn the migration into a full-site rewrite.
Send the launch date, the old and new URL pattern if available, a few URLs that lost traffic or broke after launch, your current sitemap, and anything already known about redirects, canonicals, tracking, or template changes.
Best supporting context
A recovery sprint focused on the failures that are actually suppressing visibility or breaking site behavior, with verification and a written handoff.
Sites that had a clear release or migration event followed by lost visibility, broken crawl paths, or obvious post-launch regressions.
Price expectation
Most work starts as a fixed first sprint after the issue is reviewed.
Related notes
These notes show the failure paths, checks, and verification logic that usually sit behind the sprint.
On Laravel, Next.js, and mixed-stack sites, the failure often sits in routes, middleware, rendering, or environment behavior before it sits in titles, schema, or meta descriptions.
Modern web applications built with Next.js, React, or Vue often look fine in the browser while crawlers still receive an incomplete or conflicting HTML response.
Multi-region sites need hreflang, canonicals, internal links, and sitemap structure to agree, or the wrong locale starts competing in search.
Start with the issue
Send the URL, what changed, and where the break shows up. If the issue is sharp enough, the first reply should turn into a bounded sprint instead of a broad package.